On
Newsstands
Now
Current Issue

Term Limits for Judges

By |

I don’t often write opinion pieces here at 5280. But, having practiced as a lawyer in our state and federal courts for 30 years, I know a bad idea when I see one. Term limits for Colorado judges is a bad idea. The reasons that most resonate with me are:

Here is the proposal that will be on the November ballot. Colorado Media Matters explains the measure:

Advertisement

Currently, the governor appoints Colorado Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges who have been recommended by the state nominating committee. After serving a provisional two-year term, Supreme Court justices face retention elections and, if voters retain them, serve 10-year terms, facing retention elections at the end of each term. Court of Appeals judges also serve provisional two-year terms, followed by eight-year terms, and similarly face retention elections at the end of the provisional term and each subsequent full term.

Limiting judges is a bad idea. Please learn more about the consequences before you cast your vote.

Advertisement

This isn’t a defendant or plaintiff issue, or a partisan Democrat or Republican issue. Several former prosecutors have joined defense lawyers in opposing the initiative.

Protect the independence of our judiciary. Vote No on Amendment 40.

Recommended for You

Newsletter Signup

Keep me up to date on the latest trends and happenings around Denver. 5280 has a newsletter for everyone. Sign Up