On
Newsstands
Now
Current Issue

DUI Madness

|

It is never a good idea to enact a law as a response to a singular event, no matter how horrific. That includes the tragic deaths of a mother and her two children at the 16th Street Mall last November. In response to the tragedy, apparently caused by a drunk driver, Rep. Joel Judd (D-Denver) introduced H.R. 1189 (pdf), a draconian bill which would have caused DUI penalties in Colorado to skyrocket. Sensibly, the Rocky Mountain News opposed the bill.

First-time offenders would lose their licenses for at least five years, and multiple offenders for 20 – unless they satisified other requirements we’ll discuss later.

Advertisement

The News says that Judd has revised some of the harshest provisions of his bill. That’s a good thing. We cannot treat all inebriated drivers the same.

There’s a difference between a driver who shows no visible signs of impairment and blows a 0.08 at a sobriety checkpoint and a nearly stupefied motorist who weaves in and out of traffic. Courts should be allowed to make such a distinction.

One size fits all justice doesn’t work, particularly when it involves non-flexible penalties for everyone, regardless of the the individual circumstances of the offense and the character and history of the offender.

Recommended for You

Newsletter Signup

Keep me up to date on the latest trends and happenings around Denver. 5280 has a newsletter for everyone. Sign Up