Blog

By: Jason Bane

Category: Politics

Posted: March 7, 2006 3:59 PM

Republicans Risk Diluting Ethics Message

As the Rocky Mountain News reports today, Republicans have filed an ethics complaint against Democratic state Rep. Angie Paccione, who also happens to be running for congress against Rep. Marilyn Musgrave:
Eleven Republicans in Democrat Angie Paccione's legislative district in Fort Collins have asked for an ethics investigation into her campaign's offer to introduce top fund-raisers on the state House floor. "The Colorado State House of Representatives is the people's house, not a house that Ms. Paccione can auction off to the highest bidder," the constituents said in their complaint... ...It is the third request for an ethics investigation of a lawmaker this session, which is unprecedented in legislative history. A House Ethics Committee is investigating a complaint filed against Rep. Joe Stengel, R-Littleton, over his payroll submissions last year, including billing taxpayers while on vacation in Hawaii. Stengel last week resigned his minority leadership post. The committee meets today for the first time.
The Paccione complaint stems from an offer from her congressional campaign last month that offered to introduce top fundraisers on the state House floor -- an offer that was immediately rescinded by Paccione once she learned of it. Paccione blamed the offer on an overzealous young staffer, and given the timeline of how it happened, that was probably the case. You could still make a good case for an ethics complaint, however, which is why Republicans are pursuing it, but I think it's a mistake on the part of Republicans to go after Paccione. There have already been two ethics complaints in the legislature this session -- which is unprecedented -- and both of them are pretty solid cases. Stengel's overbilling for time worked outside of the legislative session was so blatantly egregious that there was really no way to defend it (although Republicans for the most part did not openly criticize him). Democratic Sen. Deanna Hanna is also facing an ethics hearing for asking for "reparations" from a realtors group that endorsed her opponent in 2004 after telling her that they were going to stay out of the race. It is because of Stengel and Hanna that I think Republicans are making a mistake in going after Paccione. Because both Democrats and Republicans appear pretty guilty in the court of public opinion with these two legislators, nobody really has a public relations advantage; it's tough for Democrats or Republicans to call each other corrupt at this point when they both have their black sheep. But by pulling Paccione into the fray, in a case that is certainly not as clearly troublesome as Hanna and Stengel's misdeeds, Republicans risk looking petty -- even if their complaint is valid. Because there is no precedence for so many ethics charges in the legislature, to the average Joe who isn't paying attention this starts to become nothing more than a boring case of partisan politics. Rather than trying to expose a culture of corruption among Democrats, which is the obvious intent, I think what happens is that the argument against Hanna -- the stronger argument -- gets diluted by including the charge against Paccione. Hanna is by far the bigger prize here because if she is forced to resign her seat becomes available in 2006 (it otherwise would not have opened up until 2008). If I were Republicans, I would keep beating the Hanna drum and not get distracted looking for another drum to beat. You can't play them both as effectively as if you just stick with one, and the risk is that you end up losing them both.
Comments

[...] against Democrats that they’ve started to look as though they are grasping at straws. I wrote about this topic in early March, after Republicans filed an ethics complaint against Democratic Rep. Angie [...]

Press Release: (Fort Collins, CO) Partisan Republicans are behind a politically motivated ethics complaint, which was unanimously dismissed in the Colorado state legislature today. A few days before the ethics complaint against congressional candidate Angie Paccione was filed, Charlie and Sally Fox were recognized at a Larimer Republican Party event where Sally Fox was honored into the “Hall of Fame.” Photos on the party web site show Marilyn Musgrave cavorting with the Foxes. (www.larimergop.org ). The Rocky Mountain News reported that “Chuck Fox, his wife, Sally, and his mother, Virginia Davis, all signed the complaint.” The article said Fox “said he doesn't know who wrote the letter, but when he was asked to sign it, he did.” A search of the web site www.opensecrets.org revealed that the Fox’s have contributed over $800 to Musgrave’s campaigns. This is the same event where the Coloradoan reported two uniform soldiers attended, and Musgrave and Republicans attempted to use them as political prop. That article features a photo of the congresswoman and one of the two uniform soldiers in attendance. Musgrave was MC at a political event that ignored a Department of Defense directive that prohibits active military personnel from participating in partisan political meetings while in uniform. There were two uniformed soldiers at the event. One was placed in a photograph on Musgrave’s web site until it was hurriedly pulled down in the last couple days. “This is more of the same from Marilyn. I can see why Marilyn would want to distract attention away from the fact that she was on the list of the “13 Most Corrupt Members of Congress” while not getting things done on the most important issues. This groundless complaint raises the question of were they rewarding friends at the Republican dinner for their politically motivated complaint and for their contributions to Marilyn’s campaign,” said Paccione. The list of the 13 most corrupt Members of Congress is posted online, on a website sponsored by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a nonpartisan group in Washington D.C. Their mission is to provide the public with information on government officials who “sacrifice the common good to special interests,” by making Americans aware of those who betray the public’s trust. The ethics complaint against Paccione was unanimously rejected. The resolution language states that the bi-partisan House committee said “We unanimously conclude that the complaint does not state an ethical violation and must be dismissed. We do not see anything that rises to the level of an ethical violation” Paccione said, “Marilyn is on the list of the 13 most corrupt leaders. She voted on multiple occasions to weaken ethics laws, and she took $30,000 from Tom DeLay. She is the poster child for the culture of corruption in D.C. and now there is speculation that she paid off her financial supporters in an attempt to distract attention from her record on ethics.” As for the complaint filed against her, Paccione admits her campaign made a mistake and has taken action to make sure it does not happen again. She said the problem was corrected on the same day it occurred and she accepts full responsibility for her campaign. Paccione noted that Musgrave’s record of questionable ethics and links to influence peddling are wide spread. She said, “The heart of this matter is an accidental email versus influence peddling. Marilyn Musgrave accepted tens of thousands of dollars from Tom DeLay, and then she voted to change the rules in Congress to help him hang on to power.” Two questions remain: “Was there a quid pro quo with DeLay trading contributions for votes? Was there a quid pro quo with the Fox’s trading an award to help with a “dirty trick?” Paccione added.

Facebook Comments Box

Denver Real Estate 2013 - Get In The Game

Here’s why it’s finally time to get back in the Denver real estate market.

Spin Cities

We’ve highlighted some of the best road cycling routes along the Front Range and in the high...

Risky Business

Colorado’s labor market has more than its share of occupational hazards.

Escape

Each year, more than 18,000 victims of domestic violence call SafeHouse Denver’s hot line. Meet...

Get Well

From obesity to food allergies, we break down five issues facing Colorado’s kids.