An Interview With Ed Perlmutter
Last month, I interviewed Peggy Lamm for 5280. Over mineral water and coffee at the Avenue Grill, we spent two hours discussing everything from her early childhood to her passionate campaign for the 7th District Congressional seat being vacated by Bob Beauprez. Later, we followed up with a phone call. I came away very impressed with Peggy and in writing up a very short version of our discussion, I offered to interview her primary opponents.
Sure enough, I got an e-mail from Danielle at the Ed Perlmutter campaign . She said Ed would like to meet with me. This Tuesday, I interviewed Ed for two hours at the Starbucks at Republic Plaza. Once again, color me impressed. I'm glad I don't live in the district and have to make a decision between them.
I'm also learning something about interviewing politicians. They tend to answer questions with a story and a history. I ended up with pages and pages of notes, and now face the task of distilling them into a short blogpost. In the interest of equal time, I'll be following up soon with more of my conversation with Peggy Lamm.
I asked Ed, as I asked Peggy, how would he would describe the differences between them? His first response, without missing a beat, was he'd rather talk about the differences between him and Rick O'Donnell, the Republican candidate. But later on, he gave these distinctions:
- His lifelong roots in the community
- His more extensive experience as a legislator, including being Senator Pro Tem of the Senate
- His proven leadership skills, including as co-chair of Colorado's John Kerry campaign
- He's a proven winner with broad support across the political spectrum.
I'm a centrist, an independent thinker. I have no agenda. I like people. I want to make their lives better. But when there needs to be a fight, I'm a fighter. I'm a litigator. Fighting is about power, about having the majority to put values, philosophies and policies into place.As an example, he talked about the time he ran down the Senate clock on House Bill 1262 that was hostile to workers' rights by insisting the bill be read in its entirety. On gay and lesbian rights, he pointed out his support for hate crimes legislation and bills to extend domestic partnership rights.
There is not a bigoted bone in my body.Ed was riled by what he said are attempts by others to label him as some kind of fundamentalist. He is half-Jewish and half-Christian, but considers himself a Christian, although not the born-again kind.
My faith is personal, it is not political. No one believes more strongly in the separation of church and state than I do.If he's elected, what will his his top priorities be?
- To elect a Democratic speaker of the House
- To have a responsive office for all constituents
- To cut red tape
- Renewable energy: For national security, we must be energy independent. For the environment, we must reduce carbon emissions. We need to create jobs, locally and nationally.
- Balance the Budget: There must be no permanent tax cuts. We have to prioritize and focus on the issues that are most important. Stem cell research is one.
- Health care: He supports the McCain/Salazar bill. He wants to be part of a commission to study the whole health care system. We need to keep pharmaceutical costs down by using our federal buying power. We need more accountability in billing.
- We need added border security
- We need to enforce the laws we have and stiffen penalties against employers
- For the undocumented workers who are here, they should be able to earn citizenship by paying taxes, learning English, and remaining law-abiding.
At the end of the day, the guiding light on anything a legislator does is the Constitution.
Comments
Submitted by harry peterson (not verified) on Sat, 2006-11-04 16:17.
c'mon people! this man clearly does not respect homosexuals!
Submitted by Harvey Chin (not verified) on Sat, 2006-11-04 16:13.
Im doing a report on Ed Perlmutter,
and am in the process of studying not only his personality, but also the subjects that he supports and doesn't. After reading the comments that a few people have left on this interview, I'm a little confused about where he lies on the same-sex marriage issue. According to this interview, he claimd that he "likes people". How is that possible when apparently he doesn't support same-sex marriage? Does this mean that he only "likes people" who are hederosexuals?
Submitted by Elevated Voices - FBI to Join Investigation of Beauprez Ca (not verified) on Wed, 2006-10-18 20:45.
[...] FBI to Join Investigation of Beauprez Campaign The FBI has agreed to join the Colorado Bureau of Investigation/a> in investigating how Bob Beauprez’ campaign got confide [...]
Submitted by TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime (not verified) on Wed, 2006-07-12 01:04.
True Democrats
You'll notice today a new ad on TalkLeft, one that's been here before. It will be up for the next month, through the August 7 Colorado primary. Colorado has three great Democrats running for the open seat in the 7th...
Submitted by youareseeingthings . . . (not verified) on Wed, 2006-04-12 22:58.
Well, I'm not familiar with the vote or quote which mentioned above, but this is straight from Perlmutter's website:
"It is without reservation that I am proud to endorse the Colorado Domestic Partnership Benefits and Responsibilities Act. My friends in the GLBT community deserve the dignity to be able to make their own decisions concerning matters such as hospital visitation, inheritance, health care decisions, and end-of-life decisions. I commend Senator Joan Fitz-Gerald and Representative Tom Plant for working to give our state’s voters an opportunity to remedy the disparities that exist in our laws today. I believe that our state’s citizens will embrace the values of fairness and equality that this ballot initiative represents."
And here's a linke to a letter of support for Ed signed by some prominent members of the GLBT community:
http://www.perlmutter2006.com/free_details.asp?id=17
There have been some awful whisper campaigns regarding Ed's feelings about homosexuality and alternative lifestyles, but his record doesn't support any of it.
Submitted by mustbeseeingthings (not verified) on Tue, 2006-04-11 10:04.
I must be seeing things, when Ed Perlmutter says there's not a bigoted bone in his body. I'm gay, so my quality of life is my top issue. At the Stonewall Dems' candidate forum a while ago I was bowled over by the differences between Perlmutter and Peggy Lamm on this stuff. Who knew Democrats could be this far apart? According to a letter circulated by Lamm supporters, Perlmutter has voted with Marilyn Musgrave to deny same-sex couples equal rights, and he even said "Morally this is a difficult vote."
I'm flabbergasted that Ed is now saying that something which used to be a morally difficult question is now a matter of anatomy -- although I'm sure the bigoted part of Ed's body isn't his bones, it's his brain.
I used to be leaning towards Ed in this race but am now firmly in the Lamm camp for this exact reason. My equal rights should not be a morally difficult decision for anyone.

