One Man's View of the Presidential Race (II)
Last week I opined on the Democratic Presidential candidates, so now it's time to dive into the Republican side of the field.
- REPUBLICANS
Comments
Submitted by Jason Bane (not verified) on Wed, 2007-09-19 15:49.
Actually, a limited knowledge of the candidates was the point of this whole exercise. This was intended as an abstract look at what messages (or lack thereof) have resonated with me thus far. I follow the Presidential race to a degree, but I don't study the candidates - and neither do most people. This was meant to be an off-the-cuff, gut reaction kind of thing.
Submitted by km (not verified) on Wed, 2007-09-19 15:41.
I know you're a Democrat, so I wouldn't expect you to spend a lot of time on the Republican candidates, especially the second tier, but jeez:
On Guiliani: "not much of a real record of doing anything." Do the words "New York City" and "crime rate" ring any bells with you?
On McCain: "the new McCain is more like Romney, doing and saying what he thinks he needs to do and say in order to win his party’s nomination." Did you have anything in particular in mind? As a Republican, I have to say that, with the exception of his position on the Iraq War, he's as big a pain in the ass as he's ever been. That's why he's LOSING.
Fred Thompson: "I also have absolutely no idea where he stands on anything politically, which is by design." Thompson co-authored McCain-Feingold and filed an amicus brief when the bill went to the Supreme Court, for one thing. He also has an excellent website that's chock-full of amusing policy videos.
Duncan Hunter: "He’s a congressman from California. That’s all I know." He's the best national-defense advocate of the bunch.
There's nothing wrong with being uninformed about the Republicans, especially if you plan to vote for a Democrat, but I don't think I'd go around advertising it.

