Colorado's Uncommitted Superdelegates
As Hillary Clinton continues to chase Barack Obama for the Democratic nominationon Tuesday she defeated Obama in the Pennsylvania primary, keeping her campaign alive for at least another few weeksthe only group that can end the race remains hunkered down on the sidelines. Despite pleas from DNC chair Howard Dean and others, about 35 percent of the party's superdelegatesincluding six of Colorado's fourteenremain uncommitted to either Obama or Clinton.
So far, Obama and Clinton have split Colorado's decided superdelegates, a group that includes both party and elected officials. In Obama's camp: Congressman Ed Perlmutter, party vice-chair Dan Slater, and DNC members Debbie K. Marquez and J.W. Postal. Clinton, meanwhile, has the support of Congresswoman Diana DeGette, and three DNC members: Mannie Rodriguez, Ramona Martinez, and Maria Handley.
Uncommitted so far? Governor Bill Ritter, Senator Ken Salazar, Congressmen Mark Udall and John Salazar, former governor Roy Romer, and Pat Waak, the state party chair.
When 5280 contacted the undecideds, all declined to state when they'd be declaring. Taylor West, communications director for Mark Udall, told us that Udall would make an announcement after the last primary in June. "He wants to allow the full primary process to play out," says West. Cody Wertz, Ken Salazar's communications director, said much the same: "There are still several states left to vote. The senator wants the people to have their voice heard first."
The spin doctors are correct, in a sense: primaries or caucuses for seven states still remain, as do Guam and Puerto Rico. But Colorado's voters have spokena long time ago. Obama won 67 percent of the Colorado caucus vote on Super Tuesday in early February, netting him 35 Colorado pledged delegates to Clinton's 20.
Instead of casting their vote with the Colorado electorateor taking the politically tougher stance of going against the state's votersSalazar, Udall, and company seem to be making a calculated, potentially self-serving choice. By staying on the sidelines as long as possible, they're ensuring that they won't back the wrong horse too soonsomething that could destroy their chances of playing a major role in a Democratic president's administration. Salazar, for one, has been mentioned as a possible vice-presidential candidate, and Udall and Ritter are seen as rising stars in the party.
Either that, or they really want to see which way Guam goes.
Comments
Submitted by vanessa (not verified) on Fri, 2008-04-25 11:57.
How about some bets?
I'd go Ritter and Senator Salazar (like Handley, who held a prominent state position with his election campaign in 2004) for Clinton. Representative Salazar and Pat Waak for Obama. Udall and Romer undecided, but leaning Obama.
Submitted by Earthbound (not verified) on Sun, 2008-04-27 00:17.
What self-serving bull! Colorado has voted, we want the celebration when the people vote, not when the superdelegates vote! Who do they think they are? Make a stand now, and by May 20th, when Obama wins Oregon, we'll have the 2025 and be done!
What genius, besides Clinton's own Terry McAuliffe, decided we should take 18 months to fight each other and less than 6 months to beat the Republican candidate? That alone is reason to reject Clinton! What brilliant judgment! What great advisors she has! Not!

