How About Taxing Your Miles Instead of Gas?
Portland, Oregon, has installed global-positioning monitoring devices in 300 vehicles as part of a study that could lead to a tax on the miles people drive rather than the gallons of gas they dispense at the pump. The idea, which has fans in several states, including Colorado, could help states pay for deteriorating roads at a time when existing gas taxes are failing to do so, according to The Associated Press.
And, as U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio of Oregon notes, gas taxes just aren't going to keep up as people turn to more fuel-efficient cars.
But critics worry that the GPS systems required to make the plan work allow the government undue intrusion into privacy. Not only will the government know where you are, it will also know how fast you're going and can even send you a speeding ticket without ever pulling you over, opines conservative blogger Richard Miller at MileHive.
Although gas prices are down, don't expect that to last forever, writes the Colorado Springs Gazette, quoting one expert who predicts gas in the $5-a-gallon range in the next two to three years.
Comments
Submitted by John Johnson (not verified) on Sun, 2009-01-11 01:49.
I have to agree with Chas' point. If you commute to work and public transit is not available this would definitely result in unfair taxing. There has to be a better way to pay for road repair. What's next a higher municipal sewer bill for people who eat more fiber?
Aside from the taxes though, I think we should be much more afraid of the privacy risk this would pose. Sure they're just going to track our mileage for tax purposes...
Submitted by Chas Clifton (not verified) on Wed, 2009-01-07 09:38.
Aside from the privacy, which is real, the proposal amounts to a de facto tax on rural people, who have to drive more.
It could also hurt short-range automobile tourism -- would I in effect pay extra tax if I drove from the Willamette Valley to Eastern Oregon to go fishing in the Deschutes River, for instance?

