It was indeed an interesting performance. However, I think Michael Henry's poems worked a lot better than Chris Ransick's, partly because Henry's were integrated into the dance and told more specific stories that could be more easily acted (danced) out. Ransick's two poems, by contrast, were read while the curtain was down, and I kept wondering when the dancing was going to start. Finally, Mark Godden's choreography to David Rothman's poems was the weakest of the three. At times it seemed he was deliberately trying to oppose the dance to the poetry, and at other times the two seemed completely unrelated. It was an interesting experiment in combining poetry and ballet, but some of the choreographers had a better idea of what to do with the poetry than others.