What the Next Personhood Amendment Would Do
Though voters defeated a measure in 2008 that sought to define a fertilized human egg as a person, thus affording it rights, advocates of the idea will not give up. The text of 2010's proposed "Personhood Amendment," according to backers at Personhood Colorado, would clarify Colorado's constitution by stating that the definition of a "person" shall "apply to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being."
Moreover, abortion, as well as tinkering with fertilized eggs for scientific reasons, would be an offense tantamount to murder or torture: "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law."
The Colorado Independent reports that Colorado Right to Life and Personhood USA, the groups behind proposed Initiative 25, are "lining up friends and foes" in their latest campaign, including scientists at the University of Colorado-Boulder.
Personhood Colorado Director Gualberto Garcia Jones says the measure is "intended to account for human beings who may be created through asexual reproduction in laboratories and used as raw material for research, organs, or stem cells."
Such groups are mobilizing in several states, including Nevada, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which reports that if one state approves such legislation, it could be used to challenge the U.S. Supreme Court's decision allowing abortion.
Comments
Submitted by Ed Hanks (not verified) on Thu, 2009-10-29 15:25.
The first of many lies from opponents of this measure is that it protects "eggs" -- even to say it protects "fertilized eggs" is medically and scientifically absurd. Once an egg is fertilized, it becomes a zygote, and very soon thereafter, an embryo -- he or she is NO LONGER AN EGG! They are a developing human being.
And this year's language prohibits Mengele-style experiments with developing human beings, like have been imagined in sci-fi horror movies (and which some scientists today still want to proceed with).
In fact, that's how the Nazis experimented on Jews -- by declaring them "non-persons". No more Nazi doctors! Let's have Personhood to protect all people.
Submitted by Doug McBurney (not verified) on Thu, 2009-10-29 11:02.
Hooray to Michael and 5280 for the most fact laden, opinion free report on Colorado's next Personhood initiative.
This argument for Personhood stumps pro-abortion beleivers, forcong them to construct straw man after straw man. They seem to be afraid to debate the issue in a public forum like KLTT radio , (I've tried to find one). Onward to the Supreme Court, whether via Colorado another state. The race is on!!!!
Submitted by Todd Bradley (not verified) on Thu, 2009-10-29 06:00.
It's just as unworkable as the first attempt. For example, consider the law that says that in a private motor vehicle all persons under age 4 and less than 40 pounds are required to use an approved child safety seat, except with written permission from a doctor. The "Personhood Amendment" would make driving while pregnant illegal.
Submitted by Leslie (not verified) on Wed, 2009-10-28 19:45.
Rewind!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGmn2czQPrA
Submitted by Jesse (not verified) on Wed, 2009-10-28 12:44.
Something in a womb with a heartbeat... sure. The could be a person.
But an egg developed in a petri dish to be used in medical research certainly not. Do you mean to say that all human eggs in petri dishes are persons?
Submitted by William Wilberforce (not verified) on Wed, 2009-10-28 12:08.
Do you mean to say that not all human beings are persons?
That's crazy, aren't even corporations considered persons?
Of course our children in the womb are persons, if not persons, what are they blobs of cells that can magically suck their thumbs, have heart beats, and open and close their eye lids?

